Founder

Finding AI Talent on Hacker News β€” 5 Engineers Worth Reaching Out To

60% response rate vs 5% cold LinkedInResearch & Intelligence6 min read

Key Takeaway

AI agents scan Hacker News for top AI and FHE talent β€” filtering "Who is hiring?" threads, prolific commenters, and technical depth signals β€” and produced a ranked shortlist of 5 engineers worth outreaching, including 3 FHE researchers we'd never have found otherwise.

The Problem

Hiring in AI is a disaster. Everyone's competing for the same pool of ML engineers who already have 6 offers. LinkedIn is pay-to-play. Recruiters send the same 50 candidates to every company.

The talent we actually want β€” FHE researchers, agent infrastructure engineers, people who think about multi-agent coordination β€” they're not on LinkedIn changing their status to "Open to Work." They're on Hacker News arguing about lattice cryptography at 2 AM.

The signal is there. People reveal their expertise through what they write about, argue about, and build. A Hacker News commenter who writes 500 words explaining why TFHE outperforms BGV for specific use cases β€” that person knows more about FHE than most PhD candidates. And they're self-identifying by contributing publicly.

The problem is finding them. HN has millions of comments. You can't read them all. You can't even search them effectively with HN's native tools.

The Solution

The Hacker News Scraper skill on Mr.Chief, combined with competitive intelligence analysis. The agent scans "Who is hiring?" threads, "Who wants to be hired?" threads, and prolific commenters on AI/FHE topics. Filters by technical depth, engagement quality, location compatibility, and relevant expertise. Outputs a ranked list with outreach angles.

The Process

The talent discovery pipeline:

yamlShow code
# Agent: Pauly β€” HN Talent Scout
skill: hacker-news-scraper
schedule: "0 10 1,15 * *"  # Bi-monthly (1st and 15th)

scan_targets:
  monthly_threads:
    - "Ask HN: Who is hiring?"
    - "Ask HN: Who wants to be hired?"
    - "Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer?"

  topic_threads:
    keywords:
      - "homomorphic encryption"
      - "FHE"
      - "TFHE"
      - "lattice cryptography"
      - "privacy-preserving computation"
      - "multi-agent systems"
      - "agent orchestration"
      - "AI infrastructure"
    min_comment_score: 5
    min_comment_length: 200  # Filters for depth

  prolific_commenters:
    topics: ["cryptography", "FHE", "AI agents", "Rust systems"]
    min_comments: 10  # In last 6 months on relevant topics
    min_avg_score: 3

filters:
  location:
    preferred: ["Paris", "France", "Europe", "Remote"]
    acceptable: ["US", "UK", "Canada"]
  expertise_signals:
    strong: ["implemented", "built", "shipped", "contributed to", "published"]
    medium: ["worked with", "experience in", "familiar with"]
    weak: ["interested in", "learning about"]

output:
  ranked_list: true
  per_candidate:
    - username
    - expertise_summary
    - top_3_comments  # With links
    - location_signals
    - outreach_angle
    - confidence_score

The agent's analysis process:

View details
Step 1: SCRAPE "Who is hiring?" for March 2026
β†’ 847 job posts, 234 "seeking work" comments

Step 2: FILTER for relevant expertise
β†’ 23 candidates mention AI/ML/crypto/privacy

Step 3: DEEP SCAN prolific commenters on FHE/agent topics
β†’ 156 unique usernames with 10+ comments on relevant threads

Step 4: SCORE each candidate
β†’ Technical depth (comment quality analysis)
β†’ Engagement pattern (consistent contributor vs drive-by)
β†’ Location compatibility (parsed from comments/profile)
β†’ Expertise match (FHE, agents, systems, Rust)

Step 5: RANK and produce shortlist
β†’ Top 5 with detailed profiles

Sample output:

markdownShow code
# HN Talent Scout β€” March 2026

## Top 5 Candidates

### 1. lattice_wizard (Confidence: 92%)
**Expertise:** FHE implementation, TFHE-rs contributor, Rust systems
**Location:** Lyon, France (mentioned in "Who wants to be hired?")
**Signal strength:** STRONG

**Top Comments:**
- [comment_link] 347-word explanation of TFHE parameter selection
  with concrete benchmarks (42 points)
- [comment_link] Corrected a misconception about FHE noise growth
  in a Zama thread (28 points)
- [comment_link] "I've been implementing a TFHE-based private
  inference engine for the last 8 months" (19 points)

**Why this person:**
Active TFHE-rs contributor, clearly deep expertise, based in France,
and explicitly mentioned seeking new opportunities. Their comments
show practical FHE engineering, not just theoretical knowledge.

**Outreach angle:**
"Saw your TFHE parameter selection analysis on HN β€” we're the
team behind Zama and building agent infrastructure for FHE
applications. Your benchmarking approach matches exactly what
we need. Coffee in Lyon?"

---

### 2. agent_infra_dev (Confidence: 87%)
**Expertise:** Multi-agent systems, distributed systems, Python/Go
**Location:** Remote (Europe-based, timezone signals suggest CET)
**Signal strength:** STRONG

**Top Comments:**
- [comment_link] Detailed architecture post about agent-to-agent
  communication patterns (67 points)
- [comment_link] "Built a 12-agent system for automated trading
  β€” here's what breaks at scale" (34 points)
- [comment_link] Critique of CrewAI's memory implementation with
  suggested improvements (22 points)

**Why this person:**
Hands-on multi-agent builder. Already thinks about production
scale issues. Actively critiques competitor frameworks β€”
would likely be interested in our approach.

**Outreach angle:**
"Your critique of CrewAI's memory system was spot on. We're
running 31 agents in production and solved exactly the problems
you described. Want to see how?"

---

### 3-5. [Additional candidates with similar detail...]

## Honorable Mentions (Candidates 6-10)
[Abbreviated profiles for secondary outreach]

## Cross-Reference Status
- LinkedIn enrichment: Requested (via LinkedIn skill)
- GitHub profiles: Found for 3/5 candidates
- Email: Not available from HN β€” use HN messaging or LinkedIn

The Results

MetricTraditional RecruitingAI Agent Talent Scout
Talent pool scannedLinkedIn applicants (self-selected)HN's entire active community
Expertise verificationResume claimsPublic comment history
Time to shortlist2–3 weeks45 minutes
Cost$5K–$20K (recruiter fees)~$0
Quality signalInterview-dependentPre-validated by community
Outreach personalizationGeneric InMailComment-specific angles
Passive candidates foundRarelyBy design

Outcomes from the first 3 months:

  • 5 candidates identified per bi-monthly scan (30 total screened)
  • 3 FHE researchers found through comment analysis β€” none were on LinkedIn as "looking"
  • 1 hire made β€” an agent infrastructure engineer found through their CrewAI critique comments. They'd never applied anywhere. We found them through their opinions.
  • 2 conversations initiated with FHE researchers who are now consulting part-time
  • Response rate to HN-personalized outreach: 60% (vs ~5% for cold LinkedIn InMail)

The 60% response rate is the real story. When you open with "I read your comment about TFHE parameter selection and disagreed with one point β€” here's why" instead of "Hi, I found your profile interesting," people respond.

Try It Yourself

bashShow code
mrchief skills install hacker-news-scraper

Define your expertise keywords. Set the scan to run bi-monthly around "Who is hiring?" thread dates (first Monday of each month). The agent finds talent where they naturally congregate β€” not where they're being harvested by every recruiter on LinkedIn.


The best engineers don't have "Open to Work" on their LinkedIn. They have 500-point comments on Hacker News. That's where you find them β€” if you're paying attention.

talent sourcingHacker NewshiringAI agentsrecruiting

Want results like these?

Start free with your own AI team. No credit card required.

Finding AI Talent on Hacker News β€” 5 Engineers Worth Reaching Out To β€” Mr.Chief