Studio Founder
Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, and DPA — All Three in One Session
Key Takeaway
We generated a complete, cross-referenced legal document stack — Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, and Data Processing Agreement — in one 15-minute session, consistent and launch-ready.
The Problem
Launching a SaaS product in the EU requires a minimum legal document stack:
- Terms of Service — the contract between you and your users
- Cookie Policy — CNIL/ePrivacy Directive compliance for website tracking
- Data Processing Agreement — required when you process data on behalf of clients (Art. 28 GDPR)
Three documents. Each written by a different lawyer at a different time? They'll contradict each other. "Data" means one thing in the ToS and another in the DPA. The cookie policy references categories that don't match the privacy policy. Defined terms drift.
The standard approach: brief the law firm. They assign three associates (junior for cookie policy, mid-level for ToS, senior for DPA). Coordination meeting. Three separate drafts. Internal review. Client review. Comments. Revisions. Final versions.
Timeline: 2-4 weeks. Cost: €5,000-€10,000.
For a seed-stage company shipping its first product, that's either a month of runway or a "we'll add legal docs later" decision that comes back to bite.
The Solution
The Legal Advisor skill generates all three documents in a single session. Because one agent produces all three, definitions are consistent, cross-references are valid, and the documents work as a coherent stack.
The Process
yamlShow code
skill: legal-advisor
input:
document_type: legal-stack
documents: [terms-of-service, cookie-policy, dpa]
regulation: [gdpr, eprivacy, french-consumer-code]
jurisdiction: france
product:
name: "Artifice Studio"
type: b2b-saas
pricing_model: subscription
free_trial: true
trial_duration: 14_days
tos_config:
liability_cap: "12 months of fees paid"
refund_policy: "pro-rata for annual plans, none for monthly"
acceptable_use: true
account_termination:
by_user: "any time, with data export period"
by_provider: "30 days notice or immediate for ToS violation"
governing_law: france
dispute_resolution: "Tribunal de Commerce de Paris"
cookie_config:
consent_tool: "Axeptio"
categories:
essential: [session, csrf, preferences]
analytics: [google_analytics, mixpanel]
marketing: [linkedin_insight, meta_pixel]
default_state: "all non-essential OFF"
consent_duration: "6 months per CNIL recommendation"
dpa_config:
processing_activities:
- "Client data storage and processing for AI model fine-tuning"
- "Usage analytics aggregation"
sub_processors:
- name: AWS
purpose: "Infrastructure (EU-West-3 Paris)"
location: EU
- name: Stripe
purpose: "Payment processing"
location: US
safeguard: "SCCs + DPF"
breach_notification: "72 hours to controller, per Art. 33 GDPR"
data_return: "30 days post-termination, then deletion"
audit_rights: "once per year with 30 days notice"
output:
format: markdown
cross_reference: true # ensure consistent definitions across docs
language: english
The agent produces three documents with:
Cross-Referenced Definitions:
markdownShow code
## Definitions (shared across ToS, Cookie Policy, and DPA)
"Personal Data" — as defined in Art. 4(1) GDPR
"Processing" — as defined in Art. 4(2) GDPR
"Client Data" — any data uploaded or generated by Client through the Service
"Service" — the Artifice Studio platform as described in the Terms of Service
Internal Consistency Checks:
markdownShow code
## Consistency Report
✅ "Client Data" definition identical across ToS §1.4, DPA §1.2
✅ Data retention in DPA §7 matches retention in Privacy Policy §6
✅ Sub-processor list in DPA Annex III matches third parties in Cookie Policy §4
✅ Termination provisions in ToS §12 aligned with data return in DPA §8
✅ Governing law (France) consistent across all three documents
⚠️ Note: Cookie consent duration set to 6 months per CNIL 2020 guidelines
(stricter than ePrivacy Directive's 12 months)
The Results
| Metric | Law Firm (3 docs) | Agent (1 session) |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first draft | 2-4 weeks | 15 minutes |
| Cost | €5,000-€10,000 | $0 |
| Cross-document consistency | Varies (multiple authors) | Guaranteed (single pass) |
| Lawyer review needed | Still yes | Yes — but review, not draft |
| Lawyer review cost | N/A (included in draft) | €500-€800 |
| Iterations | 2-3 rounds | 1 round |
Total cost with agent: €500-€800 (lawyer review only) vs €5,000-€10,000 (full drafting).
Time saved: 2-4 weeks → 1-2 days (including lawyer review turnaround).
Try It Yourself
bashShow code
# Install via Mr.Chief dashboard after signing up at mrchief.ai/setup
# clawhub install legal-advisor
View details
Generate a complete legal document stack for our B2B SaaS launch: Terms of Service,
Cookie Policy, and Data Processing Agreement. French jurisdiction, GDPR-compliant,
Tribunal de Commerce de Paris for disputes. Make sure all three are cross-referenced
with consistent definitions.
Launch with legal docs that actually make sense together.
Three documents. One session. Zero contradictions. Our lawyer reviewed the stack in an afternoon and said "ship it."
Related case studies
Studio Founder
Auditing Our Privacy Policy Against Current GDPR — Found 7 Gaps
We uploaded our existing privacy policy and got a GDPR gap report with severity scoring and suggested fix language in minutes — finding 7 gaps that an annual €3K external DPO review had missed.
Studio Founder
We Generated a GDPR Privacy Policy in 4 Minutes — Our Lawyer Said Keep It
An AI agent drafted a complete GDPR-compliant privacy policy for a new product in 4 minutes — our lawyer reviewed it, made 3 minor edits, and approved it. Legal bill: €200 review instead of €2,000 from scratch.
Studio Founder
The Self-Generating Board Calendar — Regulatory Dates, Filings, and Meetings All in One
Our AI agent generates an annual board calendar combining AGO, AGE, regulatory filings, financial deadlines, and shareholder commitments — syncing to Google Calendar with automated reminders.
Want results like these?
Start free with your own AI team. No credit card required.